Diskuse s wikipedistou:Brox

Welcome to Czech Wikipedia!

Hello and welcome to Czech Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Thank you for logging in and for your contributions. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you need to ask any questions, visit our Village Pump.
Don't speak Czech? Our embassy will help you!
Do you need a flag for your bot? You can request for it.
In case you want to directly contact any of our administrators or bureaucrats, look at their list.

We are looking forward to seeing you here more often! Again, welcome!

With kind regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18. 9. 2009, 11:12 (UTC)

Edit of category (Category:Advokacie)

Can you explain this [1] edit? Category Advokacie does not mean Laywers (interwiki is wrong). --Wikipedista:BobM _d|p 12. 2. 2010, 19:45 (UTC)

Advokátura, Notářiat - OK, but no Advokacie, Právník, Notář etc. --Brox 12. 2. 2010, 19:50 (UTC)

Sorry, but I dont understand what you mean?? Lawyer is in czech advokát, but on czech Wiki there is no such category. --Wikipedista:BobM _d|p 12. 2. 2010, 19:54 (UTC)

Advokát, právník, notář - Služby? :-) No...

-> Advokátura (=system of Lawyers) - > Služby (ad exemplum, s. de: : de:kategorie:Rechtsanwalt - > de:kategorie:Dienstleistung ? :-). --Brox 12. 2. 2010, 20:08 (UTC)

I dont agree. Advokacie is legal profession/servis. System on german Wiki is useless --Wikipedista:BobM _d|p 12. 2. 2010, 21:16 (UTC)

Warning

Hello. Please don't remove interwikis and change categories without reason. Some of your edits are useful (e.g. this one) but others aren't (e.g. this one). If there are bad interwiki, some bot will surely fix them. If you won't stop make those bad edits, you will be blocked. If you are not sure, don't do things you don't understand. Thanks --Faigl.ladislav _slova^činy 13. 2. 2010, 15:14 (UTC)

Upių/upelių baseinų plotai

Labas, Broxai! Labai ačiū už pagirimą ;-). Siūlau pasinaudoti mano į vikipediją sudėtais duomenimis: Šešuvies baseinas, Minijos intakų it t.t. Žiūrėti ir Lietuvos upių kategoriją. Dar norėčiau atsiklausti, ar galiu padaryti nuorodą į Tamstos "Naudotojo diskusijos" puslapį? --Kusurija 22. 10. 2010, 16:39 (UTC)

Block on nl-wiki

Dear Brox (lt - admin) / Dendrolo (de - editor) / Catbot (nl - sockpuppet) / Dendroloo (nl - sockpuppet) / Redagavimas (ltwikiquote/ltwikisource - admin) / SZLT (lt - sockpuppet) / Logos (lt - sockpuppet) / Savvour (lt - sockpuppet), I am sad to have to report to you that you can no longer edit on nl-wikipedia due to repeated mis-use of sockpuppets to do detrimental and wrong legal categorisations and edits on our version. Several editors and admins amongst which me have repeatedly tried to inform you, help you and ask you to stop, but it did not work out. We then blocked your sockpuppets and told you if you wished to continue contribution you should clean up your act first. This did not help either since you reactivated a next sockpuppet account you held and continued. You were informed on all the talk pages of the socks you used on nl-wiki here. I also understood with some of your socks you ran into similar problems on other wikiversions. On nl-wiki three checkusers had to be performed to get matters into the open. Also on meta level now a checkuser has been done since the problems were expanding. The additional results can be read here. I do seriously hope you can clean up your habits cross wiki, avoid further mis use of sockpuppets and constrain yourself cross wiki to one account only to avoid confusion and problems in the future. I do hope you can do this and contact me about this via your talk page on meta as all the problems you caused harm the wikimedia projects cross wiki and should come to an end either by your choice to change now or otherwise. I do hope to hear from you soon. Kind regards, MoiraMoira 22. 7. 2011, 07:04 (UTC)

The above comment by MoiraMoira appears to have been based on an incorrect identification of socks on nl.wiki. The accounts Brox, Dendrolo, and Redagavimas are declared alternate accounts. No other socks have been conclusively identified with Brox. No cross-wiki disruption appeared in my investigation, beyond the placing of many notices by MoiraMoira, and the meta checkuser report referenced above has been corrected, with a clearing of Brox of socking charges, see [4]. --meta user Abd 15. 8. 2011, 21:33 (UTC)